{"id":463,"date":"2019-12-27T10:10:01","date_gmt":"2019-12-26T21:10:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ngatitamaotaranaki.iwi.nz\/?p=463"},"modified":"2021-12-14T10:29:38","modified_gmt":"2021-12-13T21:29:38","slug":"environment-court-interim-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ngatitamaotaranaki.iwi.nz\/environment-court-interim-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Environment Court Interim Decision (December 2019)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Background\nto the Environment Court Interim Decision<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In July 2019, the Environment Court heard an appeal from ourselves,\u00a0 Department of Conservation (DOC),\u00a0\u00a0Te Korowai Tiaki O Te Hauauru Inc, Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust and D&T Pascoe\u00a0against the independent\u00a0Commissioner's Decision and the NOR Decision regarding resource consent for an alteration\u00a0of the current designation for SH3 (to enable the construction and operation of a new 6km section of highway to bypass the existing 7.4km section).\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our appeal was on the grounds that, while we had\nbeen in discussions with New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) on reaching\nagreement on measures to address the adverse cultural effects of the Project,\nwe had not yet a final agreement, and, in order to preserve our position, we\nsought provisions to address the adverse cultural effects. We also opposed the\nconditions that provided for the direct involvement of others (in this case Mr\nand Mrs Pascoe) in a Kaitiaki Forum Group.   
\n  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Key points from the Environment Court findings for\nus are that:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n